Unless somebody knows different it's over and done? You can have a lot more interfaces in pfsense than IPcop, and you can configure them however you desire. See our newsletter archive to sign up for future newsletters and to read past announcements. pfSense VS OPNsense always seems to be a hot topic with very strong opinions on both sides. Hi guys, I want to deploy a free open source solution as a firewall to prevent unauthorized access for the network, I have two options available for me, pFsense and IPCop, what do you suggest and is it a good option to be installed on Celeron 64-bit 4GB Ram PC ? Green for trusted nodes, Blue for segregation of WiFi from Green and Orange for servers more exposed to the WAN (I have Vonage and Gizmo VoIP boxes on the Orange segment) and the firewalling between these LAN segments. We believe that an open-source security model offers disruptive pricing along with the agility required to quickly address emerging threats. pfsense is more flexible and capable in most areas than IPcop, but a consequence of that is it can be more complex.

Product information, software announcements, and special offers. It might be important to you to verify if your processor addresses AES-NI for pFSense and it's add-ins like Snort and the others. This person is a verified professional. IPCOP and pfSense are not really compareable. bit from next time?

I read back over the posts to see if I had missed something inflammatory that he might have said to merit this, but couldn’t find anything unreasonable.

There are a number of others.

There are all kinds of packages available and since it is based on FreeBSD you can even roll your own. I think the deciding factor for you is the services that you'll be needing. there is something to be said about the next gen stuff, but a properly configed pf box is about all you need. I've been running 2x pfSense appliances in a HA config (config, session states and more replicate from master to slave in near realtime with pfSync.

pFSense is a good choice however I don't think the latest version will run all the features with your processor. My experience in the IPcop forums has been less than stellar. Despite what the title of this post says, however, I don’t think that it’s really fair to compare the two head-to-head. Unlike IPFire, pfSense already has a feature for a captive portal, whereby all DNS queries can be resolved to a single IP address such as a landing page for a public Wi-Fi hotspot. Change ), Monitor DirXML/IDM Driver States with Nagios, Novell Open Enterprise Server 2 Migration Best Practices Guide - Final Draft.

The underlaying system is completely different (linux/freebsd) and the featureset is as well. on If anyone has any input on some of the differences in features between IPCop and pfSense and doesn't mind taking the time to post a response I'd be grateful. Thanks for the post. I've been running an IPCop firewall/router since December. View this "Best Answer" in the replies below », Got IT smarts? by By default it's 1194.

buy a legit piece of hardware. Tawheed For Technical Systems is an IT service provider.

An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. I really appreciate the input and I am going to give pfSense a whirl. I’m no admin and don’t want to be, but need a solid firewall. But you can run it on UDP 500 if you want, then it should definitely work on any network that allows IPsec. I really like IPcop, and think that the core developers and the folks who have volunteered their time to create such cool addons for it have done a terrific job supporting it, but for the corporate user, pfsense seems like the better option. IPCop has been through a stagnation once before and was brought back after more than half a decade. It's more important to have an understanding of routing and firewalling. No web site. Looks like your connection to Netgate Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect. I agree with your comments on IPCOP forums, whilst the system works well, I too have received undesired and unsubstantiated heat in these forums; from a self described ‘Infrastructure Architect’. pfSense can run from livecd with the config stored on a thumbdrive or floppy. Over the years I personally have not identified any …

Another user requested the same thing, and got the same answer. It's the closest thing to a commercial UTM that you will find among the completely free, open source offerings currently available and supported.

I've been very happy with it so far. I haven't used IPCop for years, but at that time it was nothing compared to PFSense. You could probably use pfSense with dual WAN even. This topic has been deleted. You haven't really stated the environment it will be running in so it's hard to say what spec you need. As far as I know, IPCop is now End Of Life. What preferred as Firewall pFsense vs IPCOP? Pfsense for sure.

IPCOP and pfSense are not really compareable.